The Trump administration is reportedly considering a radical new tariff regime that would tax foreign electronic devices according to the number or value of chips inside them. The plan, still under discussion and subject to change, aims to force tech companies to relocate manufacturing to the U.S. by making imports with high chip content far more expensive.
What’s in the proposal so far
Tariffs would be calculated based on each product’s chip content (not just blanket import duties).
Suggested rates: ~25% for general electronics, ~15% for devices from Japan/EU under proposed differential treatment.
Exemptions or credits may be offered to companies that invest in U.S. manufacturing, e.g. moving half their chip production stateside.
Earlier drafts reportedly considered excluding chipmaking tools from tariffs to avoid raising domestic production costs.
The “1:1 chip production rule” is also under discussion: companies would have to make as many chips in the U.S. as they import, or face tariffs.
This marks a big escalation beyond prior threats to tariff semiconductor imports from firms not manufacturing domestically. Trump had previously floated 100% tariffs on imported chips, with carve-outs for those investing in U.S. operations.
How it could affect chip & electronics markets
1. Cost shock for consumer goods: Every gadget—from smartphones to refrigerators—contains multiple chips. Taxing based on chip content would raise manufacturing costs for those importing components or entire products. The extra cost could be passed down to consumers, fueling inflation. Economists warn tariffs could hurt even domestically assembled goods by increasing the cost of imported chip parts.
2. Disruption of global supply chains: Tech supply chains are deeply global. A per-chip tariff forces recalculation:
- Companies may shift more assembly & chip production to the U.S.
- Firms may reroute or redesign products to minimize chip use or optimize tariff exposure
- Countries like Taiwan (TSMC) and South Korea (Samsung) could be hit hardest, unless they invest in U.S. fabs or get exemptions.
3. Opportunity for domestic chipmakers: Intel, GlobalFoundries, Micron, and others could benefit if imports become more expensive. Reports already show Intel’s stock rallied following trade speculation.
Still, scaling chip production is capital and tech-intensive, this jump might benefit those already closest to capacity, not newcomers.
4. Complexity & enforcement challenges
- Measuring chip content (by value, count, function) is tricky.
- Determining exemptions or credits for U.S. investment involves layers of compliance.
- Legal challenges are very likely. Tariff authority is contested (e.g. IEEPA).
5. Risk of retaliation & trade conflicts
Tariff moves invite countermeasures. Countries hit by per-chip duties could retaliate with tariffs or export controls. Global semiconductor cooperation could fray.
What to watch next
- Formal announcement or draft rule from Commerce / White House
- Exemption policies, especially for major chip firms
- Responses from TSMC, Samsung, Intel, Apple
- Stock reactions in chip & electronics sectors
- Legal challenges and rulings around presidential tariff powers
This is a bold attempt to rewire the electronics world through tariffs tied to chip content. If implemented, it could fundamentally reshape how and where devices are made, triggering cost increases, supply chain shifts, and potential winners and losers across tech. But the complexity, legal risk, and retaliation pressures mean it’s far from guaranteed — we’ll be watching every draft, exemption, and court move.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Related:
Nvidia Stakes $5 Billion in Intel: A Strategic Revival for the Chipmaker
Trump Turns Washington Into America’s Biggest Activist Investor With Intel Deal
Trump’s 10% Stake in Intel: A “Great Deal” or Political Gamble?
Intel Secures $2 Billion Lifeline From SoftBank, Shares Jump
